Friday, July 01, 2005

Relationships vs "friends with benefits"

What's this new trend of being "just" riends? So many peopel are doing it nowadays. "Friends with benefits". The "benefits" are usually sexual or, at the very least, emotionally intimate. This serves to blur the line between boyfriend/girlfriend and friend. guess it's a way to get your urges satiated without any entanglements. I think it's not Godly as it violates ethics. Physical intimacy should be within the confines of relationships leading to or already into marriage. If you have NO plans to marry the person, why get physically intimate with them and call it "benefits"? Isn't that the abuse of semantics? I really worry when young christians use this as a means of sexual exploration as the consequences scare me. I've been there so I won't be self-righteous but I don't want anyone to get into the same trap as I have. Hard to get out. Just think long & hard before you start justifying wrong. Later.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

NO ONE is able to share sexual pleasures without ramifications. Things happen in our spirits. I for one still feel linkages to the few girls I was intimate with outside of marriage decades ago. And there are so many other dangers. Not surprisingly, I was a lad who could have used a lot more self-esteem from home; Dad never said I Love You, Mom gave little more. Such a sad but common occurrence today. --Templar

2:43 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home